Systematic Analytical Tools for Non-Classical Emergent Behaviors in Open Quantum Networks

A three-layer diagnostic framework integrating spectral decomposition, entanglement topology analysis, and quantum synchronization witnesses for characterizing genuinely quantum collective phenomena in Lindblad-governed open quantum networks.

Physics (PH)

Key Results at a Glance

Max Negativity (Graph Dissipation)
0.387
Genuinely multipartite entanglement
Spectral Gap (Local Decay)
0.050
Constant across all couplings and topologies
Collective Decay Gap Range
5 orders
From 3.62e-10 to 5.25e-5
Network Topologies Tested
5
Chain, Ring, Star, Complete-3, Complete-4

Problem and Methods

Open Problem

Open quantum networks governed by Lindblad master equations exhibit non-classical emergent behaviors beyond consensus that lack systematic diagnostic tools. This work addresses the gap identified by Wen et al. (2026) by providing a unified, computationally tractable framework to diagnose, classify, and predict non-classical collective phenomena across arbitrary network topologies.

Three-Layer Diagnostic Framework

S

Layer 1: Spectral Decomposition

Full eigenspectrum analysis of the Lindbladian superoperator in Liouville space. Identifies phase boundaries via spectral gap, relaxation timescales, and slow manifold dimension.

E

Layer 2: Entanglement Topology

Partial-transpose negativity across all bipartitions classifies steady-state quantum correlations as separable, bipartite-entangled, or genuinely multipartite entangled (GME).

Q

Layer 3: Quantum Synchronization Witnesses

Quantum discord and quantum fraction metrics distinguish genuinely quantum collective phenomena from classical analogues. Amplitude and phase synchronization order parameters characterize coherence.

Interactive Results

Spectral Phase Diagram (3-Qubit Chain, Local Decay)

Dissipation Channel Comparison

Spectral Gap Across Topologies

Quantum Synchronization Analysis

All steady states under local decay exhibit trivial synchronization (zero discord, zero mutual information) across all coupling strengths and dissipation rates tested.

Topology Comparison Data

Topology Dissipation Coupling Spectral Gap Steady States Max Negativity Entanglement GME

Dissipation Comparison (Non-Zero Negativity Points)

Channel Coupling g Spectral Gap Max Negativity Entanglement Type GME

Key Findings

1

Dissipation Channel Determines Non-Classicality

Graph-correlated dissipation uniquely enables genuinely multipartite entanglement with maximum negativity of 0.387, while local decay, dephasing, and collective decay produce exclusively separable steady states across the full coupling range. The dissipation channel, not coherent coupling, determines the non-classical character.

2

Topology-Independent Local Decay

The spectral gap under local decay remains constant at 0.050 regardless of coupling strength (0.01 to 3.0) or network topology (chain, ring, star, complete). This reflects the topology-independent nature of local dissipation, with a fixed relaxation timescale of 20 time units.

3

Collective Decay Shows Dramatic Topology Dependence

Under collective decay, spectral gaps span five orders of magnitude, from 5.25e-5 (chain, g=0.1) down to 3.62e-10 (chain, g=2.0). Star topologies exhibit the largest gaps among collective decay channels, reflecting constructive interference in highly connected networks.

4

Trivial Synchronization Under Local Decay

All 100 parameter combinations (25 couplings x 4 dissipation rates) under local decay yield trivial synchronization: zero amplitude/phase synchronization, zero quantum discord, and zero mutual information, indicating complete steady-state decoherence.