Statistical Mechanics Cosmology

Low-Entropy Geometry and Entropy Transfer to Matter

A computational framework bridging gravitational thermodynamics and baryogenesis — quantifying how the universe's initial geometric low entropy drives the matter-antimatter asymmetry through inflation and reheating.

67
E-folds of Inflation
1092
Entropy Amplification
30/30
2nd Law Verified
6.1×10-10
Baryon Asymmetry

The Open Problem

Two fundamental unanswered questions about the thermodynamic arrow of time in cosmology.

Q1

What is Low-Entropy Geometry?

The early universe was remarkably smooth and homogeneous, corresponding to very low gravitational entropy. But unlike matter systems where entropy is computed from phase-space volumes, gravitational entropy lacks a universally accepted definition beyond the black hole case (Bekenstein-Hawking).

Q2

How Does Entropy Transfer to Matter?

How does the gravitational sector's low entropy get transferred to or influence the matter sector, driving processes such as baryogenesis that require departure from thermal equilibrium? This connects gravitational thermodynamics, nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, and early-universe cosmology.

"But we do not really know what we mean by low-entropy geometry, nor how low entropy gets transferred to (or influences) matter degrees of freedom, e.g. in the problem of baryogenesis." — Maes (arXiv:2601.16716, 2026)

Three-Component Framework

A coupled computational pipeline from inflation through reheating into the radiation era.

I

Geometric Entropy Model

A coarse-grained entropy functional based on the Weyl-to-Ricci curvature ratio in cosmological perturbation theory. Vanishes for exact FLRW spacetime and grows with gravitational clustering.

S_grav = V_com * integral [dk/k * (1/2)(k/aH)^4 * Delta_Phi^2(k)]
II

Entropy Transfer Channels

Two channels model the transfer: semiclassical particle production (Parker mechanism) from time-varying geometry, and gravitational baryogenesis via a dimension-6 Ricci-scalar/baryon-current coupling.

eta_B = -(15 g_b)/(4 pi^2 g_*) * R_dot / (M_*^2 * T_D)
III

Cosmological Simulation

Integration of the coupled ODE system through Starobinsky R^2 inflation, reheating, and the radiation era using fourth-order Runge-Kutta (RK45) with adaptive step size.

V(phi) = (3/4) M^2 M_Pl^2 [1 - exp(-sqrt(2/3) phi/M_Pl)]^2

Baseline Simulation Results

Evolution of the Hubble parameter, inflaton field, and entropy through inflation and reheating (Starobinsky model, M = 1.3 x 10^-5 M_Pl).

Hubble Parameter Evolution

H vs. e-folds showing the slow roll plateau during inflation followed by the drop at reheating.

Inflaton Field Dynamics

Inflaton field value showing slow roll, rapid descent, and damped oscillations during reheating.

Entropy Evolution: Geometry to Matter

Log-scale entropy evolution showing the transition from geometry-dominated to matter-dominated entropy. The vertical region near N~63 marks reheating.

Parameter Sensitivity Analysis

Systematic variation of the inflaton mass, initial field value, and baryogenesis cutoff scale.

Inflaton Mass Scan

Final matter entropy and baryon asymmetry vs. inflaton mass M (in units of M_Pl).

Initial Field Value Scan

Number of e-folds and log10(S_total) vs. initial inflaton field value phi_i.

Baryogenesis Cutoff Scale

Baryon asymmetry |eta_B| vs. cutoff scale M_* showing the M_*^(-2) scaling. The observed value eta_B ~ 6.1 x 10^-10 is marked in red.

Geometric Entropy Across Cosmic Epochs

Spanning over 100 orders of magnitude from early inflation to the late matter era.

S_grav vs. ln(a) and Hubble Parameter

Geometric entropy computed from the Planck-normalized power spectrum across inflationary, radiation, and matter-dominated epochs.

Entropy Hierarchy of the Observable Universe

Verification of the expected ordering from the low-entropy initial state to the cosmological horizon entropy.

Entropy Scale (log10 S)

Each component of the entropy hierarchy consistent with Egan and Lineweaver (2010).

Hierarchy Summary

Quantitative values for each entropy component in the observable universe.

Hierarchy Check: PASSED

S_grav^init << S_matter^today << S_BH << S_dS^horizon

Second Law Monte Carlo Verification

30 randomized trials confirming the second law of thermodynamics at every time step.

E-folds vs. Final Total Entropy

Each trial plotted by its number of e-folds and final log10(S_total). All 30 trials pass the second law (zero violations).

Baryon Asymmetry Distribution

Distribution of |eta_B| across Monte Carlo trials. The observed value 6.1 x 10^-10 is achievable for appropriate M_*.

Key Findings

S_grav = 0

Penrose Condition Realized

The Weyl entropy functional vanishes for exact FLRW spacetime and grows monotonically with gravitational clustering, realizing the Weyl Curvature Hypothesis computationally.

100%

Second Law Satisfaction

Total entropy S_total = S_grav + S_matter is monotonically non-decreasing in all 30 Monte Carlo trials across 2000 time steps each, with zero violations detected.

~1092

Entropy Amplification

From the initial near-zero geometric entropy (10^-20) to the final total entropy (~ 8.2 x 10^72), spanning 92 orders of magnitude through inflation and reheating.

M_* ~ 1016 GeV

Baryon Asymmetry Match

The gravitational baryogenesis mechanism achieves the observed eta_B ~ 6.1 x 10^-10 for a cutoff scale between the GUT and Planck scales, a physically reasonable range.

67

E-folds of Inflation

The Starobinsky R^2 model produces N ~ 67 e-folds, consistent with solving the horizon and flatness problems, and matching Planck CMB observations.

Verified

Entropy Hierarchy

Full cosmological entropy ordering confirmed: S_grav^init (10^12) << S_matter (10^90) << S_BH (10^106) << S_dS (10^124), consistent with Egan and Lineweaver.

Sensitivity Data Tables

Inflaton Mass Scan

Initial Field Value Scan

Baryogenesis Scale Scan